Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25951143-20150101110046/@comment-17259909-20160123232137

Viviburn wrote: That's really the whole point of polling - to see what the majority of people believe should be done. All of the pollers would be presented with the same evidence from all sides and then vote based on whatever side they found to have the most solid proof. If there was a point/counterpoint requirement in place, would that make it more balanced? Disclaimer: I'm fine with the gender-neutral page as it is now and these are merely my suggestions.

But they wouldn't vote based on what evidence is the most solid; they're voting based on personal biases.