Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25951143-20150101110046/@comment-25814498-20171201145632

Thank you for taking the time to reply, but skim reading it clearly hasn't worked since I've addressed literally every single point you have just made. I'll summarise briefly, though, since I don't want you to read massive paragraphs of text, and I don't really want to write them out, in all honesty.

People that identify as a gender other than that which they were born with, otherwise known as transgendered people, exist. This does not mean that if you are transgendered, you are the sex which you personally identify as.

Love is emotional, gender is biological. The two are not comparable.

Once again, I've addressed this multiple times, on both Kite's Talk Page and Olivemeister's GTK page. In science, sex is determined via genitalia, the ability to produce sex cells and the presence of the XX or XY chromosome. Intersex women, for instance, who have an inactive Y chromosome, are still referred to as "woman" due to their ability to produce egg cells, just as men with functioning breasts are still referred to as "men" with functioning breasts. In cases where these biological factors cannot be determined, I have already conceded that self-identity may be an appropriate metric to determine a person's pronouns, instead.

Hair colour is cosmetic, gender is biological. Again, you are not comparing like with like.

Gender is not cosmetic, it is biological. It doesn't matter how masculine or feminine a person appears to be; gender is determined by chromosomes, genitalia and sex cells.

Determining pronoun usage is not refusing to acknowledge a transgendered person's identity. It is still possible to recognise their identity while using the correct pronouns to refer to them by.

Alluka identifies as a girl; this does not make him female. Referring to him as a male is not transphobic; it is grammatically correct. Insisting that he is a male because of the sex he was assigned at birth is not transphobic; it is blatantly accurate.

That is pure speculation, with literally zero evidence in support of it.