Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25951143-20150101110046/@comment-26871067-20161019145321

OnePieceNation wrote: Olivemeister wrote: So, since Viz is apparently relevant and is information that is considered canonical to the wiki, here's this. Okay so that bit of text is made by the advertisment department and not by the translation department of Viz. This text is there to advertize the volume and get people interested in ready and buying the volume. They may have translated this directly from the japanese advertisment volume text but it is more likely that they have their own advertisment department who are trained on write such small sections promoting the volume. In short this bit of text is not concluse proof of alluka's gender. So, a caveat to what you said here.

I specifically asked if something Viz stated was considered, you said yes. This is something Viz stated. I was not offering this as conclusive proof - I didn't say anything of the sort - just adding it to the evidence compiled in this thread.