Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25951143-20150101110046/@comment-26939936-20150909044118

Does anyone want to respond to the rest of my comment?

OK, here's my proposition: based on what several people, including myself, have said and explained, we should change Alluka's gender to 'Female' and have a blurb about what the 2004 databook said in the trivia section, just like where the 'official romanizations' are located. That's reasonable, right? I mean, unless you want to refer to characters like Chrollo as Quwrof throughout entire articles instead of just mentioning it in trivia. (Not to mention the fact that the relation between Maha and Zeno in the databook has since been debunked in the actual manga, but mistakes happen)

If the manga starts back up and states that Alluka is male, then there shouldn't be any problem with changing it to male since you'd have irrefutable evidence direct from the manga that no one could argue. But as it stands, there's way more evidence IN-TEXT that Alluka is a girl.

I apologize for any typos or grammatical errors I may have made, as well as any vagueness in my writing. Like I've said, I'm not very eloquent!