Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25951143-20150101110046/@comment-26871067-20161016005150

Mountaintimber wrote: Olivemeister wrote: So, here's the document.

This is a good read, everyone needs to take a look.

Though I don't know why anyone gives a damn about what the card game says or does, on this matter or anything else like nen types and stuff, it's just a licensed cashgrab and has nothing to do with Togashi. But that's a minor, if not completely irrelevent point in the grand scheme. Honestly the only reason I included mentions of it is to contrast it with the databooks. I considered just glossing over it entirely but I felt it was maybe relevant to add in considering my piece on said databooks and why I consider the game(s) to be on par with them re: "taking it with a grain of salt". My main argument with the databook remains that other info in it is wrong and the wiki already delegates this untrue databook info to the trivia sections. It's not a holy grail, basically.