User blog comment:OnePieceNation/Age Debacle./@comment-5780397-20170110005516

While I do believe we are not doing anything wrong by leaving the pages as they are now (all ages ahve been listed; there is no reason why that should make the official one less important than the others), if it serves to lift the ban from the pages, I am fine with doing as Hiatusxhiatus2 and Olivemeister say, on three conditions:

1- The "timeline age" of Gon and Killua must be listed in the Trivia section;

2- Maha's and Netero's pages should exhibit only the retconned age, with the age before the retcon being mentioned in the Trivia, for the sake of coherence;

3- Gon's age must not be called "current", because it is not: exactly one year has passed since he was said to be 12. So, we should write "12 (Chairman Election arc)". Expecting him *not* to have aged is an assumption as well, and one that does not rely on official dates, but turns what could be a mistake in a supposed trend.

The final word on the matter remains MrGenial's, though.