Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-51.36.64.129-20190124205711/@comment-32818639-20190125180507

Pigzillion wrote:

And as an aside, I meant it when I said my input came too late into the discussion.

I never had a proper response or counter to my reasoning, but the moderators simply closed it because the wiki came to a decision beforehand.

Edit: And while it really doesn't mean the world to me, it's FUCKING INFURIATING to see and argument you were "winning" just be abandoned because people got tired of the issue

I didn't read everything, but the discussion really dragged on too much.

I am of the opinion that in the infobox must be what is in the databook, the gender ambiguity section on her page should remain, the appearance and personality sections should include that she looks like a female and behaves like a girl, and I don't care that the used pronouns remain feminine. In real life if someone seems, acts, and convinces as being female usually everyone treats the person accordingly, although relatives who have known the person since always and have seen the transformation are more resistant to acting this way.

There is no need to create a "sex" field in the infobox. Gender and sex have always been synonyms, and in addition the origin of this division is very, very obscure. Claims of a gender other than your sex indicates are strongly linked to dysphoria, and dysphoria is in the field of mental illness/condition.

Another argument is of transgender people who want to see themselves represented in works of art, but this is something purely emotional and perhaps political; therefore should not have weight here.

The point is that most users of the old discussion only came to opine on that specific topic and are not contributors to Hunterpedia. It's common to see these people intenerating through various wikias (on a political stunt), caring only for pronouns, sex, genre, and the like.