Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9051002-20170820023748/@comment-3568954-20190615200658

Zeriel00 wrote: Pigzillion wrote:

Transmutation means changing the properties of one's Aura, not a physical object; this, also, is made clear in the series, as it is stated that Transmuters change the properties of their Aura to mimic a certain substance while Conjurers are able to transform their Aura into the actual substance itself. Seriously, if this is true please explain to me the following sentence: " If a student changes the taste of the water in the glass during their water divination, they are a Transmuter "

This means that something physical CAN change quality with transmutation (Taste) and NOT be invisible, so why don't you stop being so hard headed and stop ignoring the facts?

Here's more facts for you:

Hisoka always uses a non conjured object like a hankerchief for Texture surprise so why you call it conjuring? He didn't summon anything, he changed the quality of his Nen projected on the hankerchief using the hankerchief to cover his wound.

When he fixed himself from fighting Chrollo he didn't summon anything he literally applied Aura to his face, Hand and foot and TRANSMUTED IT into looking like his real skin  i.e. color and texture. Or are you saying he summoned skin, hand and foot? don't you need months of training to conjure ONE thing?

Biscuit Krueger's ability is called Body transmutation, she turns into a little girl and people can see her so why would you say Transmutation is always invisible? How do you explain this? did she conjure a little girl? No, she transmuted her entire body to be the size of a little girl. It's not an illusion and it's not a conjuration so it's transmutation.

There's an error in thinking transmutation is always 100% of the time invisible because of the explanation in the anime. In the anime they where talking about Aura like Killua's electricity or Hisoka's Bungie gum so ofcourse those are 100% of the time invisible BUT If you transmute something that already exists and change it's color or texture then it will be visible because it wouldn't make sense otherwise.

I'm starting to get annoyed when you ignore every fact I've presented and say is conjuration without offering anything to back it up except the common misconception that Conjuration is visible and Transmutation is not, 100% of the time. Both water divination and Biscuit completely prove you wrong for transmutation not being able to be visible and using In proves you wrong again for Conjuration not being able to be invisible.

I think I've proven my case more than enough and unless Togashi himself says it's conjuration, I think everything evidenced here proves that it's actually Transmutation. Why even present a hankerchief or paper in the first place if it was conjuration? wouldn't that be kinda redundant? Bisquit's body change isn't transmutation. its an unknown catagory. in the newest arc she says she has no idea how she did it, she states that there is a lot of unknowns about Nen. there is possible there are other catagories other than the basics. she says that back in the day she just wished to look different and slowly over time it happened, one day she could simply take on a younger less athletic appearence.