Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-48285-20150915044407/@comment-25744472-20160423173501

Pigzillion wrote: Not gonna lie, I almost converted when I read that link... Then I did some research, and it all got whisked away.

What you just linked is not an accurate description of human embryonic development, at all; it was plagiarized by muhammed from the Greeks idea of embryonic development. They (wrongly)believed that during human reproduction, the male's semen fertilized the females menstrual blood, which then formed a blood clot, a ludicrous statement. The only time this could be considered true is during a miscarriage, at which point it is no longer considered alive. Since Muhammad had many wives, it is more than likely that he was very familiar with miscarriages and the "dead mass of clotted blood" there in.

The 4 stages the Quran describes are also completely inaccurate; modern science tells us that human embryonic development is continuous and seamless, nothing like the 4 definitive stages the Quran describes. It is also important to note that these 4 stages are identical to the 4 stages of embryonic development described by Galen. The Quran's plagerism of greek phylosophy and medical teachings can also be found in their description of how sperm is formed(found in Surah 86:7), not only completely inaccurate, but also identical to what Hippocrates and his students taught. All of this information and the information stated in the previous paragraph were well-known during Muhammad's time, making it blatantly obvious why such inaccurate facts can be found in the Quran.

While the link you provided avoids many of these issues by translating alaqah as leech, there are still many problems with the Quran's explanation. For one, it means that the embryo must look leech like for between 40-80 days, when in reality the embryo shown in that link only appears that way for about 2 days(between days 24 and 26 of development), and for another, it is a much less accurate translation, as Fairuzabadi(compiler of one of the most important arabic dictionaries) states in the Qamos al-Muheet that it has the same meaning as a "clot of blood".

So there you have it. The so called "science" in your holy book was not only completely inaccurate, but also plagiarized from ancient Greek scholars by Muhammad to be regurgitated as the "word of God". I see....Okay, Alex. Your response, with its three paragraphs, is as easy to disprove as 1 2 3... ESPECIALLY the second paragraph. I planned to say this in every previous reply of me, but I thought *why not just give him a chance to talk about my religion,and since I believe it will end up with him converting IF he will really understand what I'm going to talk about, whatever I'm going to take about.*

So sorry for you, you won't get any response about any religious discussion from me anymore because whenever I try to say something, you're reply take us many steps backwards with its wrong (or in better word unrelated) informations.

I said it last time and going to to repeat it...I'm letting you with [ this book]. If you're going to read this book, always put in your mind and never forget that Qur'an is not book of science, it is book of signs.