Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-25951143-20150101110046/@comment-26871067-20160927164347

Rez spb wrote: Maybe you just see what you'd like to see instead, huh? ;) Moreover, pointing fingers at other people and calling names... Are you sure you want to continue, like is there no moderation here? =)

Putting that aside, stop it. Neither of us knows what the author means unless he speaks his mind clearly on this point, and I see you did not read my point on having the family to make everyone a male, so please read that again. That definitely concurs with everyone but Killua (not your obedient child, huh) calling Alluka 'male'.

Also, I don't know why you want a girl to be a trans, maybe reflecting or anything, that's your business, but what was shown us is a supposedly male character turned in definitely female. And... I don't know how to break it to you... The age of gender identity. How old is Alluka? We can actually stop here. If the author decides to announce that Alluka was meant as a trans all the way, that will definitely raise uncomfortable questions like the one above. So lwt's be good boys and gilrs, stop calling names and accept points of view other than yours, Olivemeister. You're repeating textbook transphobic arguments and saying I'm "calling names" for saying you're transphobic. "She's a kid so she can't know her gender identity, checkmate". When you were 9 you probably knew what your gender was - a trans girl can know she's a girl just as easily as a cis girl. It's different for everyone, of course, but trans kids can absolutely know and many do.

But here's me calling you an actual name - patronizing. You are literally speaking to me as if I am a child, and I don't appreciate that at all.

I won't even really address you feeling the need to imply I'm projecting my own gender (I am a man FYI, so if you're trying to say I only believe this bc I'm a transgender woman guess again), because it's irrelevant and only serves as an attack on me intended to delegitimatize my argument by implying it's emotionally-based. As if someone being emotional about a topic somehow nullifies all facts presented.

You said yourself that you didn't read the whole thread, so I suppose I can't expect you to know this. I've been in this thread for weeks pulling actual evidence from the series, in context, that support the very sensible conclusion that Alluka is a transgender girl. I've been discussing this with people in this thread, and I feel no one has been able to offer a sensible argument given both the text of the series and the external information (the precedent of Togashi including transgender characters in previous works) for Alluka not being a transgender girl.

If you don't want to see that, you don't want to see that. But your argument is full of holes and transphobic sentiment.