Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-48285-20150915044407/@comment-25814498-20160421152817

Marceline Saga wrote: So you didn't?! I don't believe how is it even possible for you to argue about something you still don't know.

I told you, if you're so proud and confident of your beliefs, keep them....I tell you to keep them.

Never think I don't have proves and explanation for your confusions. But I know the discussion will last forever. As I persist in my beliefs, I know you persist in yours. So what is the point of this? To have fun?

You should be thankful I gave you a value and replied since I had to ignore your offenses. Uh, yeah... You didn't actually respond to anything. You just sort of said; "You didn't check the Quran for miracles(that didn't happen) and see if they had any scientific implications?! Then how dare you argue with me!" Did you read what I said or did you cancel it out?

I realise that you might be getting tired with this conversation(at this point so am I), so I only ask you to respond to this sentence that you failed to respond to before:

"Sorry, but a 2000 year old book is completely useless in proving the existence of Allah or any miracles there in. Just because something has been around for a while doesn't make it accurate; in fact it's normally the exact opposite, like how we thought that objects in motion get tired or that the earth is flat." Do you agree with this statement? If not, why?