User blog comment:Foreva/HxH is rich and quite popular, why are there so few articles on Hunterpedia?/@comment-180.193.78.3-20111213102040/@comment-4562821-20111213125500

That's quite a rant. I'm assuming that with points #3 and #5 you are directing your words at me, for this afternoon I deleted some paragraphs in the Trivia section on Killua's page? My quick reply to you is that you should try putting yourself in the shoes of some regular contributors like me and others.


 * 3: It's a false idea that once a contribution is made to Hunterpedia, it becomes untouchable: Even though this wiki has been an admin-less community with no rules regarding how a contribution must be made, in order to maintain a decent level of consistency, there exist some unspoken standards agreed upon by the regular contributors, namely: (1) it should be as close as possible to the official English translation published by VIZ media; (2) the manga takes priority over any form of adaptation; (3) it should be free of speculations.


 * 5: While quantity is desirable, quality is even more important. Having over 9,000 edits per month would be pointless if 2/3 of them are back-and-forth changes. Also, while perfection is not a requirement at all, any person who wants to contribute should make some effort ensure that their contribution meets the general standards of grammar, readability and relevancy. If they don't, they should expect that another editor will make corrections to what they submitted. I myself have done this a number of times to articles google-translated from the French Hunterpedia and posted here by someone.

We're all equal on this wiki page, even some of us are going to become admins soon. If any person whose contributions got deleted/changed disagrees with the one who deleted/changed them, they can always challenge to have it put back in the article, provided that they can give solid arguments.